After playing Dr. Michael Mancini on the original Melrose Place from 1992 to 1999, actor Thomas Calabro is back in familiar shoes a decade later as the more mature and professionally advanced Dr. Mancini in the new Melrose Place on The CW. Interestingly, Thomas Calabro was the only original Melrose Place actor to be with the popular ’90s hit throughout its entire run. Now Calabro finds himself back in the sudsy, primetime dramatic mix in a new generation of TV that’s, as Thomas Calabro told us, allowing Melrose Place to get away with as much push-the-envelope material as the first incarnation of Melrose Place.
Now acting as the father of new Melrose Place character, David Breck, played by Shaun Sipos, and the head doctor at the hospital, Thomas Calabro quickly found Michael Mancini embroiled in a murder mystery Melrose Place plot that saw Mancini break into his son’s apartment only to get arrested, land in jail, and become more entangled in even more unlikely murderous mayhem. In classicMelrose Place fashion, Mancini’s old villainous flame, Amanda, played by Heather Locklear, are in the thick of the drama just like old times on Melrose Place.
Ahead of the March 9 return of Melrose Place at 9pm on The CW, we got some exclusive one-on-one time with actor Thomas Calabro to find out how a potential reunion between Dr. Mancini and Amanda could work, the status of a second season of Melrose Place, the impact of Heather Locklear, and how the dynamic between Mancini and Amanda will affect the rest of the Melrose Place season.
THE DEADBOLT: So how does it feel to be in prison for a crime you didn’t commit?
THOMAS CALABRO: How does it feel? Look, everyone in prison didn’t commit the crime they’re in jail for, so it’s a raw deal for all of us.
THE DEADBOLT: How do you relate to Mancini now, as compared to who he was during the original run of the show back in the ’90s?
CALABRO: Well, first, how he’s changed. He’s much more powerful, both financially and in the medical community, his stature in there. He’s invented a device, which gives him what looks to be unlimited funds by the car he drives. At the hospital, he’s no more seeking to be the Chief of Staff as he was fifteen years ago when everything was about moving forward in his medical career, his surgical career. Now he’s at the top of the heap and he’s got nothing much to lose, or nothing to gain, I should say, and everything to lose. So he’s in a way different position than he was before.
Now he’s got a family, or had a family until his wife got convicted for committing murder. So he’s quite a different guy. He’s a little more gothic, a little more sleek. He’s a little more untouchable than he was before and that’s going to change in the second half of the season. We’re going to see a lot more of his vulnerability.
But how do I relate to those guys? Well, I’ve got a family and kids. So I’m very protective of them like Michael was of his family – his family with the little boy – trying to keep outside influences from adversely affecting it. So, I’m very protective. I’m still about his height but he’s not quite as good looking as I am in person. So those are the things that have changed and we still have in common. [laughs] Oh yeah, and his reckless nature. I forgot about that.
THE DEADBOLT: Do you still get recognized walking down the street? Do people yell out, Dr. Mancini?
CALABRO: Yes, but it depends on where you are. In New York they yell out Dr. Mancini and call you names. In Los Angeles, you get more sideways glances.
THE DEADBOLT: How much of the show’s identity is defined by Amanda? How do you think that affects the show?
CALABRO: Well, I think it’s Heather [Locklear] and what her television persona represents. When you hear Heather Locklear is on the show, and you remember her as Amanda Woodward, it’s that character’s genes you’ll remember as she played them. So it’s almost like her and Amanda are one. Certainly, Amanda Woodward and what she did defined all of those places the fist time around as much as Michael did. You know what I mean? The kind of backstabbing, bed jumping behavior was what kind of defined the show. And those two characters did a heck of a lot of it, maybe more than anybody else on the show. So that’s how I feel she contributes. People go, “Oh, well, if Heather is on that show, Amanda is back, and that kind of stuff is what’s going to go on. That interests me. I want to see that.”
THE DEADBOLT: In what ways could a potential reunion between Amanda and Dr. Mancini work?
CALABRO: It could work in many scenarios. We’ve already introduced the idea that these guys had relationships during the last ten years much like Sydney Andrews and Michael Mancini. It was determined they’ve been having an ongoing affair. We also indicated that between Amanda and Michael as well. That goes on into the second half of the season and there’s fireworks waiting to happen between those two characters.
THE DEADBOLT: Well, that’s something for the fans to look forward to. So now that we’ve seen Sydney back, we’ve seen Amanda and Jane. What other characters from the original Melrose Place would you like to work with?
CALABRO: You know, I always say that each and every one of them had their own unique dynamic and talent they brought to the show. So I hate to point out any one of them because they’re all so great to me. I loved working with so many characters that were on our show throughout the seven year run we had the first time around. But if I had to pick one, it would be the Playboy bunny that was on my lap. I’d like to meet her again, I never got her number.
THE DEADBOLT: How do you feel about the upcoming storylines with Dr. Drew and how that will affect Lauren and also David?
CALABRO: Yes, there’s a lot brewing in the pot with those four characters you mentioned. [laughs] There are like four different triangles going on in those four characters that are happening in the second half of the season. Yeah, that’s going to perk up quite a bit and it’s personal and professional and financial. All of those three elements come into play for those characters and it’s going to be a lot of fun.
THE DEADBOLT: Given the other CW renewals, what’s the word on a second season of Melrose Place?
CALABRO: Well, what I see on the internet a lot, I see the word “cancelled” a lot, but we are not. I’m actually quite confident that we’ll be back for a second season and there’s a couple of reasons for that. I see parallels between our Melrose Place this year and the one that came on in 1993. We went through the same sort of viewership struggles for the first season but creatively we were on our way to finding our legs from day one. I think that’s happening again.
We’re redefining the second half of the season. I mean, not a big redefine but we are making some adjustments and I think that’s going to be much more appealing to our audience. Like the first time around, we didn’t get eyeballs on the show and we’re not getting eyeballs that much now. But I think we will now get more eyeballs. I think if we get people watching the show and not making judgements on it based on what they hear, I think we have a quality show and people are going to watch it and we’re going to come back for another year. I think internationally we’re doing terrific right now and I think it’s going to be a big hit there and that could bring us back.
THE DEADBOLT: Comparing the original show to now, do you think the new show is getting away with more than the original?
CALABRO: Well, I mean I hope it’s getting away with more, relatively. Television is getting away with so much more ten years after the first Melrose Place , isn’t it? So relative to that, no, we’re probably getting away with just as much. I mean, the first time around we were struggling with a gay man kissing a gay man and we shot it with them kissing. Then by the time it got to the air, they kept editing it back, editing it back, editing it back so that they cut away and the audience never saw their lips actually meet. This time around we talk about one of our main characters being a trisexual the first episode. The world has changed in fifteen years and I think Melrose Place reflects that.
THE DEADBOLT: How would you sum it up? That it’s a good reflection of pop culture?
CALABRO: Yeah, I guess so. Melrose Place, by some people’s estimates, defined pop culture in the ’90s, or at least was a big contribution to it. Now we’ve still got all of that wonderful wardrobe and quippy dialogue and we’re dealing with issues of texting and what can happen with all of that internet stuff now. I mean, it’s a very timely show once again. So I think it is, once again, very reflective of people’s fantasies now and what it could be like and how much fun and exciting it is. A bigger reflection of what goes on in Los Angeles as well, maybe even more than the first time around.
THE DEADBOLT: How is the dynamic between Mancini and Amanda going to affect the rest of the season?
CALABRO: There’s going to be more going on for both our characters with other characters. You’re going to sort of see our spider webs expand somewhat. Now, between Heather and I, specifically, between our two characters, specifically, there’s an intrigue. There’s an intrigue that moves forward through the second half of the season. Something is going on between us. Something is very potentially – It just simmers right beneath the surface. And I’ve said this before, everything we have is never quite just about what the scene is about. Not just about her getting a phone number or me doing some doctoring to her, underneath there’s a relationship there that’s waiting to be explored, that’s dying to be explored.
Source: www.thedeadbolt.com
Posted On 08 Mar 2010